|
| Cast
of the holotype of Archaeohyrax
patagonicus (MACN A52-617) in right lateral (left), dorsal
(center), and anterior (right) views. The specimen was
collected
by Carlos Ameghino from the Deseadan beds of Chubut, Argentina and was
described by Florentino Ameghino. |
Archaeohyracids ("ancient
hyraxes") traditionally have been one
of the most poorly known groups
of notoungulates.
They
tend
to
be rare in most faunas in Argentina and until recently, only a
single skull had ever
been described (the holotype of Archaeohyrax
patagonicus.)
The
earliest representatives of the group appear in Casamayoran faunas
and
are
notable
for being among
the first
taxa in South America to exhibit hypsodont (high-crowned) cheek
teeth; hypsodonty is a characteristic feature of even early
archaeohyracids, and geologically younger species tend to have
increasingly hypsodont teeth. Like interatheriids,
archaeohyracids retain a complete, closed dentition; all have a full
complement of teeth with only small spaces (diastemata) separating some
of the more anterior teeth. The postcranial skeleton of
archaeohyracids is
unknown, though specimens are likely present in fossil collections from
Bolivia and Chile (see
below). Despite the group's name, archaeohyracids are in no
way related to hyraxes (nor do they closely resemble them). The
reconstruction to the left (from
Savage and Long, 1986) probably isn't very accurate, but it
is one
of the few that is out there; no postcranial bones from archaeohyracids
have yet been described.Archaeohyracid teeth, when newly erupted, display the "face" pattern of fossettes typical of other groups of typotheres. In more hypsodont taxa the central fossa and the labial fossettes are lost with
wear; the smaller fossettes generally disappear before
the larger, more persistent, central fossa. The lower teeth
resemble those of hegetotheriids, but retain varying numbers of
isolated fossettids that can be diagnostic of various taxa.
Phylogenetic studies suggest that
archaeohyracids are not a natural (i.e., monophyletic) group, but
rather represent
a paraphyletic collection of taxa related to hegetotheriids (see
cladogram to right from Croft et al., 2003). Both
archaeohyracids and hegetotheriids share several derived character
states of the skull including a vertical septum in the auditory bulla
and a more anterior placement of the carotid foramen (medial to the
auditory bulla). In Deseadan
faunas where archaeohyracids and hegetotheriids co-occur - such
as Salla, Bolivia - specimens of the "advanced" archaeohyracid Archaeohyrax
can be difficult to distinguish from specimens of the basal
hegetotheriid Prohegetotherium.
|
![]() |
| Archaeohyracid
specimens from the
Tinguiririca Fauna, central Chile, in occlusal view. From
left to
right: palate of Archaeotypotherium tinguiriricaense
with
P1-M2 on both sides; right maxilla of Archaeotypotherium
pattersoni
with P2-M3; fragmentary right mandible of Pseudhyrax
eutrachytheroides with m2 talonid and complete m3; palate of Protarchaeohyrax
minor with P2-M3 on both sides. For detailed
descriptions of
these and other archaeohyracids, see Reguero
et
al., 2003 and Croft et
al., 2003. |
|
Interest in archaeohyracids
has increased over the past decade due to the discovery of the
Tinguiririca Fauna of central Chile and active collecting in the Salla
Beds of Bolivia
by research groups from the University of Florida and Duke
University. In both of these faunas, archaeohyracids are
quite
common. Besides Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile,
archaeohyracids
have only been recorded in Uruguay, primarily due to the scarcity of
appropriately-aged faunas in other countries. Archaeohyracids
are absent from several appropriately-aged faunas, including Santa Rosa
(Peru), Tremembé (Brazil), and Moquegua (Peru), though these are
probably just sampling artifacts. Six species of archaeohyracids have been recorded from the Tinguiririca Fauna, the greatest diversity of archaeohyracids known from a single locality. At least two skulls of Archaeotypotherium tinguiriricaense have been collected and postcranial remains are likely present but unidentified. Archaeohyracids are also abundant at Tinguiririca, accounting for many of the identified specimens. (Due to the very hard matrix covering these fossils, however, relatively few have been fully prepared.) The diversity and abundance of Tinguirirican archaeohyracids - all of which are very hypsodont - provide strong evidence that the mammals of Tinguiririca were living in an open woodland or grassland-like habitat. Species from Tinguiririca also have been recorded at some other central Chilean localities. |
![]() ![]() |
| Archaeohyracid (Archaeohyrax suniensis) upper teeth from Salla, Bolivia in occlusal view; anterior is to the right and specimen on right has been flipped virtually to match left. Both are from collections at the University of Florida. The specimen on the left illustrates relatively unworn teeth from a young individual; the last tooth (M3) has only partially erupted. The specimen on the right illustrates very worn teeth from an older individual. Note the loss of fossettes and the very differently-shaped teeth in the older individual. For detailed descriptions see Billet et al., 2009. |
|
At Salla, Bolivia
Archaeohyrax suniensis (see above) is one of the most abundant
animals in
the fauna; for this reason, a nearly complete ontogenetic series has
been recovered, permitting the changes in occlusal morphology with wear
to be studied in detail. This species has extremely hypsodont
cheek teeth, only forming roots in old individuals. In later
stages
of wear, the teeth resemble those of hegetotheres in their lack of any
enamel folds or fossettes. It is
the
latest-occurring member of the group. Stratigraphic Range: Casamayoran (Vacan; ?middle Eocene) to Deseadan (late Oligocene) Geographic Distribution: southern Argentina, northeast Argentina, northwest Argentina, western Bolivia, central Chile, Uruguay Taxonomy: Order Notoungulata: Suborder Typotheria: Family Archaeohyracidae (this probably is not a monophyletic group) Representative Taxa: Eohyrax, Pseudhyrax, Punahyrax, Archaeotypotherium, Protarchaeohyrax, Archaeohyrax Selected References: Billet, G., B. Patterson, and C. de Muizon. 2009. Craniodental anatomy of late Oligocene archaeohyracids (Notoungulata, Mammalia) from Bolivia and Argentina and new phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 155:458-509. Croft, D.A. and D. Weinstein. 2008. The first application of the mesowear method to endemic South American ungulates (Notoungulata). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 269:103-114. [Focuses on three species from Salla, Bolivia, including Archaeohyrax] Croft, D.A., M. Bond, J.J. Flynn, M.A. Reguero, and A.R. Wyss. 2003. Large archaeohyracids (Typotheria, Notoungulata) from central Chile and Patagonia including a revision of Archaeotypotherium. Fieldiana: Geology (New Series) 49:1-38. Reguero, M.A., D.A. Croft, G.M. López, and R.N. Alonso. 2008. Eocene archaeohyracids (Mammalia: Notoungulata: Hegetotheria) from the Puna, northwest Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 26:225-233. Reguero, M.A., D.A. Croft, J.J. Flynn, and A.R. Wyss. 2003. Small archaeohyracids (Typotheria, Notoungulata) from Chubut, Argentina and central Chile: trans-Andean temporal correlation. Fieldiana: Geology (New Series) 48:1-17. Simpson, G.G. 1967. The beginning of the age of mammals in South America. Part II. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 137:1-260. [Describes Eocene archaeohyracids] |